What Will the Board Do If Swarthmore Votes Yes to Divest?

mountain justice

Editor’s note: This article was initially published in The Daily Gazette, Swarthmore’s online, daily newspaper founded in Fall 1996. As of Fall 2018, the DG has merged with The Phoenix. See the about page to read more about the DG.

Today, Swarthmore students are voting on Mountain Justice (MJ)’s referendum for partial divestment from fossil fuels. Though the referendum has already captured the attention of the student body, it’s not certain what influence its outcome will have on the Board of Managers meeting this weekend.

Mountain Justice argues that the new partial divestment proposal was crafted with feedback from administrators and the Board’s concerns in mind, but it’s unclear if the Board will treat it differently than the divestment proposals they’ve rejected before.

Sample advertisement

“Mountain Justice’s present proposal is similar to ones that have been made before, so it does not represent a change from what they’ve asked for in the past,” wrote Vice President of Finance, Greg Brown, in an email. “Representatives from Mountain Justice have offered partial divestment as a strategy in conversations that I’ve had with them over the past years, and we have been clear that this strategy would not be effective relative to our portfolio. The Board’s 2013 and 2015 decisions on divestment from fossil fuels followed extensive discussion, and there are no plans to revisit this decision.”

Additionally, Brown wrote, very few of Swarthmore’s investments are in the separately managed accounts that MJ’s referendum wants to divest from, and the proposal doesn’t account for the complexity of the college’s investments.

However, Mountain Justice argues that the referendum addresses the main concern the Board had with previous divestment proposals: that it would require the College to change fund managers.

“In meetings with us and President Smith, the only objection that Greg Brown presented to our proposal was that it would be morally inconsistent to only partially divest. He has not provided any reason why this would not be feasible,” wrote MJ member Stephen O’Hanlon ‘18 in an email. “We all deserve serious engagement with this issue and we hope that if this referendum passes the Board seriously addresses it at their meeting this weekend.”

Furthermore, even if the student body approves the referendum, the results of Student Government Organization (SGO) referenda are non-binding—the referendum doesn’t hold the SGO or the Board of Managers to any decision or action.

Accordingly, student government referenda have a mixed track record at Swarthmore. In 1994, 61% of students voted to fly an American flag above Parrish, and a similar proportion voted to have greek organizations admit students of all genders in 2013. Additionally, 90% of students opposed changes to senior week in a 2014 SGO poll. Of these, only the 1994 flag referendum—which the Administration had already supported—was acted on.

Nonetheless, Mountain Justice is committed to pressuring the Board to consider its proposal if the referendum is approved.

“I’m relatively confident that we’re going to have a majority for yes,” MJ member Aru Shiney-Ajay ‘20 said. “I think we anticipate it being a slightly longer fight, but we do hope that this semester, with everything that is happening politically, we can move folks to divestment. I think that the political climate has put us into a situation where it’s more urgent than ever.”

Matthew Chaffinch

Matthew is a junior from Delaware. He is a Contributing Editor for The Daily Gazette.

Brandon Torres

Brandon is a current Education/English special major student, with hopeful plans to eventually share his passion for these subjects with both high school and middle school students. Though he dreams of publishing a novel one day, he spends a considerable amount of his time fantasizing about being a novelist rather than well, actually writing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

The Pros of Divestment Outweigh the Cons

Next Story

Grassroots Organization Seeks to Put Alcohol Licenses on the Ballot

Latest from News

Swarthmore Leaders React as SEPTA Announces Severe Cuts

On April 10, the South-Eastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) announced widespread service cuts and fare increases for the 2026 fiscal year. The cuts, which total a 45% reduction of service, are the culmination of several years of long-term deficits that have only

New NCAA Policy Implications for Transgender Student-Athletes

Under a new NCAA policy banning transgender and gender non-conforming athletes from participating in women’s sports, the status of potential Swarthmore student-athletes is in question. The policy, enacted Feb. 6, places no restrictions on who can participate in men’s teams, but bans

Resident Peer Leader Hiring Cycle Sees Surge in Applications

As the spring semester comes to a close, many students and administrators are well into preparations for the 2025-2026 school year. The housing lottery has finished, students have completed pre-registration for classes, and many open campus jobs, including Resident Peer Leaders (RPLs),

Dr. Wade Manora Jr. Takes on IC Role

In January 2024, the Intercultural Center (IC) announced a change in leadership for the first time since 2019. Dr. Wade Manora Jr. is the new Assistant Dean and Director of the IC, succeeding Dr. Imaani El-Burki in the role. Manora was the
Previous Story

The Pros of Divestment Outweigh the Cons

Next Story

Grassroots Organization Seeks to Put Alcohol Licenses on the Ballot

The Phoenix

Don't Miss