Transparency and safety

October 31, 2013

In the wake of the Halloween party, it is clear that there were considerable failures on the part of Student Council, Public Safety, and the administration with regard to creating and publicizing party policy. Students did not know what to expect at the party, and were often surprised by the new measures that were put into place. These changes to standard protocol were put into effect with little coordination between the organizers, and without any information given to the student body. Additionally, there was no opportunity for students to have input into the new procedures before the party.

Perhaps the most surprising new policy implemented at the Halloween party was the substantial increase in the presence of Public Safety officers inside the venue itself. For, as much as the administration and Public Safety assert that officers are there only for the safety of students, the presence of authority figures at a student event is disconcerting, to say the least. The problem with Public Safety officers is that they can police apart from protect. The fact that there was no explicit reason given for their presence created an uncomfortable atmosphere.

The change in the way alcohol was served also came as a surprise to most. Tougher enforcement measures were implemented without any warning before the party. There are numerous reports of individuals seeing the security at the bar, leaving the party, and returning later, visibly more drunk. The policy, and the way that it was implemented, seem counter-productive to promoting safe drinking practices.

Sample advertisement

The new security protocols at the door, too, seem unnecessary and counter-productive. Several students who were told that they could not enter with water bottles waited outside Sharples to finish their beverages, whatever they may be, quickly before entering. This is completely unsafe, and indefensible. The card-readers that were used at the door are reported to have cost $4000 each, a seemingly unnecessary expense.

There was a complete lack of transparency in developing and implementing these new policies. Students were not consulted, or even informed, beforehand. This is both unfair and irresponsible.

The first opportunity given to all students to participate in a discussion relating to these policies happened this past Tuesday, three days after the Halloween party. This discussion should have happened before the party in order to develop policy.

We, as students, have a right to be treated with respect and as adults. The administration, Public Safety, and Student Council should be far more transparent. They should actually communicate with students before they establish new policies. We believe that the Halloween party represents an enormous failure to communicate on the part of all parties involved. Communication between Public Safety, Student Council, the administration, and the student body is vital. Policy changes should not be concealed nor made without dialogue. They affect us all.

Previous Story

Faith and Spirituality at Swarthmore: Salman Safir ’16 on Islam and Intersectionality

Next Story

DOJ lawsuit against students’ interests

Latest from Opinion

Letter from 129 Alumni Boycotting Reunion

We are writing as alumni/ae from the classes scheduled to hold their reunions in 2025 who have been saddened and outraged as we have watched Swarthmore abandon its principles over the last year and a half. We have watched as students protesting

Weekly Column: Swat Says

Did you do anything fun for Easter? Adrian Ferguson ’26: No. Homework. Ian Flynn ’28: I went on a nice, long walk in the woods. Jonah Sah ’27: I visited the house of one of my friends. His family is quite Jewish,

William Jin Platform

My name is William Jin, and I am running for SGO Senate at-large. I am running not just as an individual, but as a MOVEMENT. A movement to democratize Swarthmore by ENDING the two-party DUOPOLY that has a stranglehold on campus. For
Photo Courtesy of James Shelton

Rethinking the Origins of COVID and Pandemics to Come

In the summer of 2021, when I was still a ritualistic viewer of Stephen Colbert’s “The Late Show,” I remember a particularly striking conversation Colbert had with Jon Stewart about COVID. Stewart had been relatively removed from the public spotlight for several
Previous Story

Faith and Spirituality at Swarthmore: Salman Safir ’16 on Islam and Intersectionality

Next Story

DOJ lawsuit against students’ interests

The Phoenix

Don't Miss