Letter-to-the-Editor: Environmental Justice Responds to Divestment Decision

September 16, 2013

Editor’s note: This article was initially published in The Daily Gazette, Swarthmore’s online, daily newspaper founded in Fall 1996. As of Fall 2018, the DG has merged with The Phoenix. See the about page to read more about the DG.

Letter by members of Swarthmore Environmental Justice:

 

As members of Swarthmore Environmental Justice (EJ), we are writing to express our solidarity with and support for Mountain Justice’s campaign for divestment.

We take issue with the way the Board’s letter applauds the work of Ecosphere while dismissing the value and necessity of divestment. Each of the groups within Ecosphere addresses environmentalism from a different angle, and we do not support the premise that one method of environmental activism is inherently more valuable than another.  While EJ focuses on more concrete ways we can work to build environmental justice – namely, by cultivating a community garden in collaboration with Chester residents to increase those residents’ access to local food – we recognize that more systemic change is also necessary.  We feel that divestment (by challenging the persuasive political power of the fossil fuel industry) is an important piece of that structural change.

EJ was formed to directly address issues of environmental injustice as they play out in Chester. We define environmental injustice as “the disproportionate concentration of environmental hazards in communities of color and low-income communities.”

The EJ garden project in Chester grew out of conversations with residents over lack of access to fresh food. We see the project as one means of addressing this problem, but we also acknowledge the need for larger systemic change to address issues of institutionalized environmental injustice (e.g. the overwhelming proportion of incinerators placed in low-income communities of color, including Chester). We see divestment from fossil fuel industries (whose extractive practices are overwhelmingly harming low-income communities and communities of color, and whose effects are already being felt, especially in the Global South) as one valuable and necessary means of creating more systematic change.

Environmental justice asserts that every person, regardless of race, class, nation or other variables, has the right to a healthy and safe environment. Working towards environmental justice means working on a variety of fronts at once: demanding divestment from institutions we have access to, demanding changes in access to good food and good jobs, and demanding that no one have to deal with the destructive effects of the extraction and burning of fossil fuels. All of these methods are worthwhile, and all necessary.

We commit ourselves to joining Mountain Justice in their continued push for divestment, and we call on Swarthmore to commit themselves to environmental justice.

Sincerely,

Thomas Boucher, Rachel Giovanniello, Laura Laderman, Chris Moyer, Isabel Newlin, and Laura Rigell

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Letter-to-the-Editor: Earthlust Responds to Divestment Decision

September, Swatter
Next Story

The Swatter: September 9-16

Latest from Opinion

It’s All Corrupt, Girl

Olivia Huang '29 argues that the concerning prevalence of political censorship targeted at artists should be directly linked to corporate consolidation and collusion -- a phenomenon which has disturbing consequences for artistic freedom of expression.

Weekly Column: Swat Says

In this edition of Swat Says, students reflect on their personal writing process, discuss their academic direction from years past, and suggest how the school should repurpose Clothier Hall.

The Dining Hall Shows Regime Change Can Be Good

Arman Hanifpour '27 argues that we should be more less quick to reflexively condemn the idea of regime change, whether it comes to something as mundane as the Swarthmore Dining Hall or as consequential as war in the Middle East.

Weekly Column: Swat Says

In this edition of Swat Says, students share their opinions on changes happening around campus and discuss under what circumstances they would share their most vulnerable thoughts.
Previous Story

Letter-to-the-Editor: Earthlust Responds to Divestment Decision

September, Swatter
Next Story

The Swatter: September 9-16

The Phoenix

Don't Miss