Politicizing Tragedies

May 2, 2013

Two weeks ago, the nation was thrown into shock. One of our country’s most dear sporting events was attacked, our friends and family were thrown into danger, and our most historic and beloved city was shut down entirely. Within 24 hours, and even earlier in some cases, many politicians, pundits, and ordinary citizens were using the bombings to advocate for their various political agendas. Some cited the bombers status as immigrants as reason for immigration reform. Some called for gun control reform while others called for more lax gun laws that would allow Bostonians to defend themselves from the bombers (because arming a pissed off and terrified group of citizens would definitely not lead to anything bad). These cries for change were met with more outrage than support. Many people were appalled that political agendas would take the forefront so soon after a tragedy like the Boston Bombings.

It seems that every time there is a tragedy this happens. After the Newtown school shootings there were calls for changes in gun control laws. The same was true after the Gabrielle Giffords shooting. Every time these attempts to use tragedy for reform they are met with the same mix of support and outrage. Many people believe it is disrespectful to those harmed or affected by the tragedy to use their suffering as tool to advance a political agenda. However, this isn’t necessarily true.

Every time I have had a discussion with a friend or fellow student about this issue I find myself asking them the same thing — if not now, then when? Just as there was no more appropriate time to discuss gun laws then after the Aurora shootings, there is no more appropriate time to discuss harder background checks and stricter immigration laws than now. Nothing exposes the flaws in our political systems and laws more than a tragedy like this. Perhaps no reform could have prevented the tragic events two weeks ago, but that’s not the issue. The point is that now that these problems are exposed, we should move to fix them.

It is very important that we do not forget the victims of these tragedies. But I fail to see the correlation between forgetting them and having a discussion about fixing a problem that lead to their harm. If we do nothing or wait six months to have a discussion then we are doing little to honor the memory of the victims. What would do more to honor the memory victims than to prevent more people from dying in the same way?

I am not advocating any political point about immigration or gun control. All that I am arguing is that no death should be in vain. If we do not learn from the events of in Boston then we are dooming ourselves to more tragedy in the near future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Grown-Up Stories: Summer Book Recommendations

Next Story

The Year in Review: Accounts of Activism

Latest from Opinion

It’s Morning Again in America

The year is 1984. You turn on the TV, take the Walkman out of your ears, and are greeted by a calming voice as pastel-colored, grainy images of people living the American Dream come to life. A boy riding a bike tosses

Weekly Column: Swat Says

This or That from the Swarthmore community: What are your plans for spring break? Marco DeStefano ’27: I’m lowkey only leaving for half of spring break but I intend to spend the rest of it on SEPTA. Jade Buan ’27: I’m going

Eroding Trump’s Divinity

On March 4, in an address to a joint session of Congress, Donald Trump repeated claims, made originally after the assaination attempt on his life, that he was “saved by God to make America Great Again.” In short, like his inauguration speech,

The Rational Ideology of Philadelphia’s Urban Landscape

Dostoevsky would have detested the city of Philadelphia. In many ways, the city exemplifies everything that he hated about the West in general; problems which, in his view, were beginning to infiltrate Russia as well. He was appalled by what he saw
Previous Story

Grown-Up Stories: Summer Book Recommendations

Next Story

The Year in Review: Accounts of Activism

The Phoenix

Don't Miss