Brain and language: Insights from studies of American Sign Language

January 27, 2006

Editor’s note: This article was initially published in The Daily Gazette, Swarthmore’s online, daily newspaper founded in Fall 1996. As of Fall 2018, the DG has merged with The Phoenix. See the about page to read more about the DG.

As opposed to popular views of sign language, Dr. David P. Corina, Ph. D. of the University of California’s Departments of Linguistics and Psychology, asserted that sign language is no different than the spoken language, rather than a byproduct of any spoken language. Last night, in front of a mixed crowd of young and old, deaf and able, Dr. Corina expressed the nature and significance of his research concerning sign language’s intrinsic value to linguistic research and the understanding the human brain.

Dr. Corina’s research focuses on the astounding similarities observed within the brain between sign and spoken language. And thus, Dr. Corina stresses the independence of sign language as an actual language. “People always ask, how did sign language start, and I tell them, exactly how spoken languages started. The facts about sign language: it is not an invented language Ð it is a language that has evolved naturally, much like English or Spanish,” he said.

In fact, the inception of American Sign Language (ASL) is accredited to Hartford, Connecticut. According to Dr. Corina, ASL was established in Hartford in an effort guided by French signers. Therefore, modern ASL and French Sign Language have similar roots, like the similarities of the Spanish and Italian spoken languages. However, ASL and British Sign Language are completely incompatible, like the Spanish and Thai spoken languages.

According to Dr. Corina, the only difference between sign and spoken language is the method with which they are delivered. Like English, ASL has a natural history of evolution and growth. Studying the human brain has allowed Dr. Corina to examine the similarities in neurological activity between signers and speakers.

Dr. Corina’s research poses the question: What parts of the brain are involved in sign language? The answer: many of those parts involved in spoken language. While this answer may seem obvious, historical research involved the brain and spoken language, neglecting to engage sign language as an official language.

“We need to study sign language and the areas of the brain it affects. Why is this necessary? It is necessary to understand for the educational practice of how the brain changes with learning; to understand the normal plasticity and adaptability of the human brain; for the sake medicinal research; and just out of basic curiosity,” Dr. Corina said.

In a developmental study of infants, Dr. Corina provided evidence that children are born with an interest in language. “Infants are pre-equipped to tackle any language they are exposed to, but after 10 months, they have a preference for the language of their community,” he said.

Experimenting with six month-old infants, Dr. Corina determined that infants showed a preference for sign language over pantomiming. The results of this experiment provided evidence to qualify Dr. Corina’s claim that children are born with an interest in knowledge. Given that sign language is an actually language, whereas pantomiming is mere gesticulation, infants should have and did have a preference for the sign language.

Also, testing the human brain’s performance when exposed to semantic and syntactic grammatical errors, both speakers and signers demonstrated equal neurological activity. This discovery provided more evidence that sign language is like any other spoken language. According to Dr. Corina, language is developed on the left hemisphere of the human brain, centered in the Braca and Wernicke areas of the brain. These areas demonstrate equal activity and functionality in both signers and speakers.

“Sign language, like spoken language, is a continuously evolving language. There are many different sign languages, like there are many different sign languages. There is no universal sign language. We are moving closer to understanding the neurobiological study of language by including sign language, ” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

Campus movie screenings in limbo

Next Story

SaBooge Theater brings atmospheric “Fathom” to campus

Latest from Sports

Athlete of the Week: Kela Watts

Junior Kela Watts ’26 is a student-athlete on the varsity women’s lacrosse team. The attack from Tampa, FL made an immediate impact on her arrival to Swarthmore, scoring one goal and assisting two in an eleven-game appearance in her first collegiate season.

Weekly Recap

Men’s Baseball Swarthmore College: 1, Berry College: 11 On Feb. 21 in Kannapolis, NC, the Swarthmore Garnet fell to the Berry College Vikings. The game took eight innings and lasted three hours. The Garnet led into the sixth inning, but the Vikings

Can We Change the Way We Think About Sports vs. Music?

Fun fact: my middle school gym teacher called me “grossly unfit” in seventh grade. Most of my life, I’ve been nowhere near athletic, until very recently, when I started picking up jogging. I’ve trained myself up to a slow ten miles, which

The Sports World’s Super Bowl Reactions

On Sunday, Feb. 9, the Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Kansas City Chiefs 40-22, earning their second championship in franchise history. There was no question about who would come out on top, as the Eagles scored 34 unanswered points before the Chiefs responded

AOTW: Theo Teszler

Theo Teszler is a first-year Track and Field athlete from Newton, MA. He went to Newton North High School and is a prospective engineering major. Teszler predominantly runs the 400-meter race and has now broken two programs records in this event. Katie
Previous Story

Campus movie screenings in limbo

Next Story

SaBooge Theater brings atmospheric “Fathom” to campus

The Phoenix

Don't Miss