Editor’s note: This article was initially published in The Daily Gazette, Swarthmore’s online, daily newspaper founded in Fall 1996. As of Fall 2018, the DG has merged with The Phoenix. See the about page to read more about the DG.
The Daily Gazette
  Swarthmore College
  Wednesday, October 1, 2003
  Volume 8, Number 23
  Write to us! daily@swarthmore.edu
  Photo of the day: http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/org/daily/photo.html
  Today’s issue: http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/org/daily/
NEWS IN BRIEF
1) Student Council approves group charter amendments
2) First Board of Managers meeting discusses construction, living
  wage, budget
SPORTS IN BRIEF
1) Swat field hockey crushes Bryn Mawr
2) Women’s soccer shut out by Muhlenberg
WEATHER FORECAST
Today: Light rain, high of 64.
  Just when I thought I had the enthusiasm and drive to tackle the onslaught of
  midterms…
Tonight: Partly cloudy, low of 47.
  They had to go and post the trailer for the next Lord of the Rings movie online…
Tomorrow: Mostly sunny, high of 61
  It’s truly a dark day when the forces of constructive/academic nerdiness and
  unproductive/Tolkien nerdiness are pitted against each other so mercilessly.
TODAY’S SHARPLES MENU
Lunch: French bread pizza, crinkle cut fries, tuscan bean bake, greek bar,
  magic cookie bars
Dinner: Grilled strip steak, duchess potatoes, pasta with sauce, wild rice
  with cranberries and pecans, asparagus, pasta bar, strawberry shortcake
NEWS REPORT
1) Student Council approves group charter amendments
In a series of unanimous votes at the Tuesday meeting, Student Council members
  approved the changes in student group charters that were revealed at the town
  hall meeting on the 23rd. The changes will create a new category of student
  group that receives official recognition from the college but does not receive
  any SBC funding. The full text of the proposal and coverage of the town hall
  meeting can be found in the Gazette archives at
http://daily.swarthmore.edu/archive/fall_2003/20030924.html#n1.
*****
2) First Board of Managers meeting discusses construction,
  living wage, budget
The first Board of Managers meeting of the academic year took place on September
  19 and 20. There, the Property Committee debriefed on the college’s construction
  plans for the Science Center, new dorm, and Parrish renovations, altogether
  culminating in more student living and lounging spaces. The Ad Hoc Committee
  on the Living Wage then delivered a presentation on their current investigation
  of issues concerning the implementation of a living wage.
A major discussion point of the meeting was the budget and the Capital Campaign,
  which has raised $138.4 out of the projected $230 million. The endowment now
  stands at $970 million, up from a low of $810 million. The Board also listened
  to presentations on issues such as resource distribution, alumni donations,
  and expenditure reduction.
Student Council co-presidents and student observers to the Board of Managers
  Anna Morgan ’04 and Emiliano Rodriguez ’05 have provided the college community
  with a detailed summary of the meeting, its implications for student life, and
  recommendations, most notably to the Ad Hoc Committee on the Living Wage. 
Board of Managers Luncheon Summary
 The Swarthmore College Board of Managers held its first meeting of the 2003-2004
  academic year Friday and Saturday, September 19th and 20th. The discussions
  held over the two day period not only have relevant impact on student life today,
  but also long term ramifications for the future of the College. 
The Property Committee centered its discussion on the current construction
  the College is undertaking. Within a year, the Science Center and new dormitory
  should be completed, allowing for the renovation of Parrish Hall to begin. The
  renovation of Parrish should be completed within a year, and will be much more
  student-oriented. The current home of the Admissions Office will be converted
  into a new post office and student lounge area, and the FMFCU will be moved
  from Kohlberg to Parrish 1st. Admissions will ultimately be housed on the second
  and third floors of Parrish. There will also be a loss of dormitory rooms on
  Parrish 2nd and North. The renovation will include steps to improve fire safety
  and elevators to meet ADA compliance. 
The Academic Affairs Committee examined the new Intellectual Property Rights
  Policy which has already been passed unanimously by the faculty. Most notably,
  the liberal policy applies to the entire community, not simply faculty.
 The meeting of the Student Life Committee was replaced by a board-wide discussion
  of the Living Wage. Vice-President Melanie Young and Prof. Barry Schwartz presented
  the work of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Living Wage. It was noted that the purpose
  of the committee was not to determine whether or not the College should adopt
  a Living Wage Policy. Rather, the Committee was working to determine how, if
  the College decided to implement a Living Wage, it would be carried out. The
  Ad Hoc Committee is currently examining issues including benefits vs. wage increases,
  wage compression, and means testing. The Living Wage and Democracy Campaign
  passed out supplemental materials to the Board due to their dissatisfaction
  with the information included in the information packet distributed to the Board
  prior to their meeting. After Young and Schwartz’s presentation, the observers
  were asked to leave while the Board held a discussion regarding the Living Wage.
On Friday night, Prof. Paul Rablen presented to the Board his comparative analysis
  of how Swarthmore and similar small Liberal Arts Colleges distribute resources.
  The Board was excited to learn that, in general, Swarthmore provides the same
  academic breadth as other colleges, but to a much smaller population of students,
  therefore leading to larger expenses. We feel that two distinguishing characteristics
  are worth mentioning: Swarthmore tends to hire more leave replacements, and
  tends to have a higher percentage of students taking science courses than the
  other institutions included in the study.
 Regarding the financial situation of the college, the Capital Campaign has
  currently raised $138.4 million of the $230 million it expects to raise within
  the next three and one third years. As an added incentive, Eugene Lang has offered
  an additional $5 million towards that goal only if the Campaign is able to raise
  $87 million within the coming three years. Our endowment is once again flourishing
  at $970 million, as compared to its previous low of $810 million.
 A survey of four hundred alumni has been completed in order to determine how
  to make the remaining period of the Capital Campaign most effective. The survey
  revealed that while most alumni have a positive impression of the college, many
  do not feel that Swarthmore needs their money, and instead, tend to give charitably
  to other causes. The Board concluded that the importance of alumni donations
  to the perpetuation of the college must be emphasized, and will begin to stress
  the Campaign in most of its alumni publications. 
In addition to discussing how to increase funds, the Board was concerned with
  how to reduce expenditures. The Expenditure Review Committee as well as the
  Committee on Educational Policy began looking at cost cutting measures that
  could be undertaken by the College. The ERC will focus primarily on how to increase
  the efficiency of the College, while the CEP will discuss how to shrink the
  budget more directly. Issues to be discussed by the CEP will include: whittling
  down on leave replacements thus decreasing the number of courses available to
  students, re-examining team teaching and the benefit it can provide when a course
  is continually team taught, questioning policies regarding the credits professors
  may receive for thesis advising, and using the Tri-College Consortium to maintain
  the diverse course offerings were new policies to be implemented. Some Senior
  Staff members, as well as members of the Board of Managers expressed the opinion
  that it may be important at some later point to discuss whether or not Swarthmore
  should continue to remain as small as it is currently. 
We, as student observers to the Board, have drawn a few conclusions from this
  meeting. First, we would encourage the Ad Hoc Committee on the Living Wage to
  provide more of a public forum regarding its work and ideas. Given the importance
  of the living wage to many students, we feel that more public access to their
  plans would be beneficial to the entire community. We would also like to express
  concern as to the confidential nature of the Board discussion regarding the
  living wage. It is an issue of extreme relevance and importance to the campus
  community, and it would be contrary to the mission and purpose of our institution
  if such a discussion was not transparent. Second, we feel that Prof. Rablen’s
  study would be even more relevant and beneficial to the college if it included
  statistics from schools that we consider to be competitors of Swarthmore, for
  example, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, and Pomona. Finally, we hope that any discussion
  regarding increasing student population and/or decreasing the breadth of curriculum
  available to our students does not leave the preliminary stages. We feel strongly
  that one of the distinguishing features of the college, a characteristic that
  makes us truly competitive with schools like Harvard and Stanford is its small
  size relative to its breadth of curriculum. We thank the board for the opportunity
  to observe the majority of their proceedings, and welcome any questions or clarifications
  regarding this statement. 
Anna Morgan ‘04
  Emiliano Rodriguez ‘05
  Student Council Co-Presidents
  Student Observers to the Board of Managers
*****
* President Bush said Tuesday he welcomed a Justice Department investigation
  into who revealed the classified identity of a CIA operative. “If there’s
  a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is,” Bush told reporters
  at an impromptu news conference during a trip to Chicago, Illinois. “If
  the person has violated law, that person will be taken care of.” In a July
  column, syndicated journalist Robert Novak named former Ambassador Joseph Wilson’s
  wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA operative on weapons of mass destruction, citing
  Bush administration sources. Wilson has said he believes the White House is
  behind the leak of his wife’s identity, an act of retribution for his revelation
  of flaws in the British prewar intelligence report. Bush cited the report in
  his State of the Union address in January. Said Bush in his impromptu speech,
  “Leaks of classified information are bad things.”
* North Korea said on Tuesday it was not interested in further talks about
  its nuclear program and was beefing up its nuclear deterrent force to repel
  a possible pre-emptive attack by the United States. Pyongyang’s comments came
  as U.S., Japanese and South Korean diplomats met in Tokyo to discuss strategy
  to deal with North Korea’s declared nuclear deterrent, including how to reassure
  the communist state about its security concerns. North Korea has been under
  pressure to return to the negotiating table ever But South Korean Unification
  Minister Jeong Se-hyun said that he believed the North was ready to continue
  talks. “Some can interpret the North Korean reaction as its typical tactic
  to ratchet up its bargaining chip to gain more leverage in future negotiations.”
  He said intelligence agencies in Seoul and Washington had concluded that the
  possibility of North Korea formally declaring itself a nuclear arms state and
  conducting nuclear and missile tests was low.
* Indonesian lawyers have criticised plans by the Justice Ministry to criminalise
  sex outside of marriage and some sexual acts by minors. The ministry is drafting
  an amendment to the criminal code to include acts not currently categorised
  as crimes but seen as immoral, such as cohabitation and premarital sex. The
  move is apparently in response to a clamour by some Muslim groups and political
  parties for the introduction of Islamic law.The draft proposes that a couple
  found guilty of cohabitation be jailed up to two years, while minors (those
  under 18) who engage in sodomy and oral sex could be jailed for 12 years. A
  man who impregnates a woman but refuses to marry her could spend up to five
  years in prison. A ministry spokesman said that Muslim leaders, including experts
  in syariah law, had been consulted over the draft revisions. Indonesia is the
  world’s most populous Muslim nation but Islam is not the state religion and
  the country in general practises a tolerant version of the faith.
* Thailand’s atomic energy agency has received the go-ahead to construct a
  long-planned nuclear test reactor, agency officials said, despite concerns that
  the project could be unsafe and harmful to the environment. Officials at the
  Office of Atomic Energy for Peace confirmed a report in The Nation newspaper
  that a construction permit had been granted for a test reactor at Ongharak district
  of Nakhon Nayok province, 90km north-east of Bangkok. The go-ahead was given
  at a meeting on Monday of the National Commission on Atomic Energy for Peace.
  Deputy Prime Minister Suwit Khunkitti, who oversees the atomic energy office,
  was quoted by The Nation as saying that the project was necessary for research
  and development. Construction had been delayed by protests by environmentalists
  and residents near the proposed site, as well as by policy changes by several
  successive governments.
*****
University of Iowa Premed Meeting
  Parrish Commons, 12:30 p.m.
Edward Said Memorial Service
  Intercultural Center, 5:00 p.m.
Peace Corps Info Session
  Bond, 6:30 p.m.
WRC Open Hours
  WRC, 7:00 p.m.
SAC Study Break
  Parrish Parlors, 9:00 p.m.
Rhythm n Motion Hip Hop Dance Workshop
  Upper Tarble, 9:30 p.m.
Film Society Screening: ‘Together’
  Science Center 101, 10:00 p.m.
*****
SPORTS UPDATE
1) Swat field hockey crushes Bryn Mawr
With an amazing five goals in the first half, Swarthmore turned in a 5-1 victory
  over Bryn Mawr Tuesday. Chelsea Farrell ’05, Heidi Feiselmann ’06, Lauren Sippel
  ’05 , Helen Leitner ’05 , and Emily Sydlowski ’05 by way of Joanna Hess ’05
  all scored goals and Jenn Hart ’04 made 4 saves.
*****
2) Women’s soccer shut out by Muhlenberg
On Tuesday, the Garnet fell 3-0 to Muhlenberg, a team ranked 8th in the Mid-Atlantic
  region poll. Although they were outshot, the Swat team kept the deficit to one
  goal until the second half. Keeper Catherine Salussolia ’04 recorded ten saves
  in the game.
*****
Today:
  Men’s Soccer host Washington, 5:00 p.m.
  Volleyball at Widener, 7:00 p.m.
Tomorrow:
  There are no contests scheduled for tomorrow.
*****
QUOTE OF THE DAY
“Life is a moderately good play with a badly written second act.”
  –Truman Capote
*****
 Interested in reporting or writing for the Gazette?
  Got a news or sports tip for us?
  Just want to tell us what you think?
Contact the staff at daily@swarthmore.edu
| Managing Editor: | Pei Pei Liu | 
| Campus News Editors: | Greg Leiserson | 
| Living & Arts Editor: | Evelyn Khoo | 
| World News Editor: | Roxanne Yaghoubi | 
| Sports Editor: | Saurav Dhital | 
| Associate Editor: | Megan Mills | 
| News Reporters: |  Scott Blaha | 
| Sports Writers: | Jenna Adelberg Sarah Hilding Holice Kil | 
| Photographers: | Robbie Hart | 
| Webmasters: | Charlie Buffie | 
| Weathercaster: | Josh Hausman | 
The Daily Gazette is published Monday through Friday by an independent
group of Swarthmore College students. The Daily Gazette Web Site is updated
regularly, as news happens. Technical support from the Swarthmore College
Computer Society is gratefully acknowledged.
Our world news roundup is compiled daily, using a variety of sources, most
notably the Associated Press (www.ap.org),
Reuters (www.reuters.com), CNN
(www.cnn.com), and The New York Times (www.nytimes.com).
Our campus sports
summaries are derived from information provided by the Swat Athletics Department
(http://www.swarthmore.edu/athletics/).
To subscribe to the Gazette, free of charge, or to cancel a subscription,
go to our subscriptions page on the web at
http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/org/daily/subscribe.html.
Back issues are available on the web at:
http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/org/daily/archive.html
This concludes today’s report.

 
            
