the independent campus newspaper of swarthmore college since 1881

Thursday, May 24, 2012



Modern Bye Bye Birdie shoots far, overreaching its origins

BY ANNE COLEMAN

In print | Published February 25, 2010

Albert Peterson may want the audience to “put on a happy face,” but they are far more likely to shudder. That is because Michael McCormick, who plays Albert in The Players Club of Swarthmore’s current production of “Bye Bye Birdie,” is tap dancing away the number with youngsters Annie Byers and Lyndie Moe with a grin that is more Big Bad Wolf than Bill “Bojangles” Robinson. This predatory tone is certainly not the director’s intent, but the combination of Ashley Richardson’s forceful choreography and McCormick’s extraordinary height , made more evident by the fact that he is dancing with two young high school girls, leaves a bad taste in your mouth.

Anne Margaret in Bye-Bye Birdie

Anne Margaret in Bye-Bye Birdie

“Bye Bye Birdie” is the story of a music producer (Albert Peterson) who is deep in debt, about to lose his star client to the draft. His secretary and love interest concocts a publicity scheme to turn Conrad Birdie’s next single into an instant hit and to bring the production company back into the black that sends the trio (Albert, his secretary Rose and Birdie) to Sweet Apple, Ohio. To accompany the release of Birdie’s single, “One Last Kiss,” Birdie will bestow a kiss on one lucky fan the day before he ships out to war, which will be broadcast on “The Ed Sullivan Show.” Written in 1960 and set in 1958, with songs about teenagers going steady and sipping Cokes with your one true love, a modern production of “Bye Bye Birdie” ought to feel sweet and nostalgic. Instead, director Mary Leigh Filippone attempted to modernize the play. The result is underwhelming and occasionally vulgar.

This production of “Bye Bye Birdie” has more than its fair share of young talent, but it is the unsettling moments like the one woman-seven man orgy at the Shriner’s meeting — a graphic and extreme interpretation of the “Shriner’s Ballet” — that one remembers. The word “orgy,” which shows up unnervingly often, is an understatement and not just in reference to the “Shriner’s Ballet.” In the song “Ice House Livin’,” Filippone’s teen chorus of 16 middle-schoolers and young high schoolers maul Birdie and squeal “Let’s have an orgy.” A line which should demonstrate how innocent and confused the kids of Sweet Apple are is turned into a parent’s worst nightmare, even though the clothes stay on. When the parents discover this debauchery and send Birdie to jail for consorting with the underage, it seems like Birdie would be well within his rights to press charges against some of the older children for displaying raw sexual aggression.

The fact that this scene was so disturbing can be credited to Filippone’s flawed vision and her pool of very talented teenage actors. A particular standout is Sara Prendergast in the role of fan club president Ursula Merkel; her wild devotion is nothing short of brilliant. Prendergast has a career ahead of her if she chooses to pursue acting. Darby Biasotto, as Kim MacAfee, the girl selected to receive Birdie’s kiss, also does a bang-up job, in part due to her high soprano and good ear.

Among the adults, Andrea Kalan gives a fine performance as Rose Alvarez, but lacks flair. Her voice is just right, and her attitude is faithful to the script, but she fails to form a deep connection with the audience. Perhaps it is her devotion to McCormick’s boring Albert which hinders audience sympathy, but whatever it is, no amount of playful choreography could inspire the sympathy necessary to make the time pass quickly. Length was an issue for the production, which dragged along at a snail’s pace whenever Albert was on stage and was only briefly boosted by the occasional presence of Birdie and a hilarious cameo by the choreographer (Ashley Richardson) in the role of Gloria Rasputin.

Filippone would have done better to devote her energy to making the illusion of 1958 complete instead of trying to force a modern connection. If you’ve never seen “Bye Bye Birdie,” this is an acceptable introduction, but only if one regularly reminds oneself that this is local theater. Although it is unusual to encourage an audience to see a film production of a play or musical instead of seeing it live, this case is an exception. McCabe Library has a copy of the Dick Van Dyke/Ann Margret/Janet Leigh film on DVD, complete with an Ed Sullivan cameo, that is far less unsettling — not to mention free.


Discussion


Anonymous
About 2 years ago

I totally disagree with this “reviewer’s” opinions. I saw the show at our local theater gem and enjoyed every minute. The energy, music, staging, choreography, and pace were excellent. Time flew for me and the rest of the audience who obviously enjoyed the production as we laughed, toe-tapped, and applauded each number. Albert’s character was particularly strong as he was a kind, enthusiastic, caring, honest, and “clean” man. You must have been looking for something unsettling. The show is sweet, true to the author’s intentions, and far more entertaining than the version I saw on broadway just last year.


Anonymous
About 2 years ago

The reviewer suggests that for a “cleaner” version of Bye Bye Birdie, people should view the movie starring Ann Margret. This is ironic given that Ann Margret’s performance is hyper-sexual, as she gyrates provocatively in her midriff top, and is way too old to be playing a 15-year-old.

I thoroughly enjoyed the Swarthmore performance of Bye Bye Birdie and thought it was hilarious and right on-target.


Anonymous
About 2 years ago

I completely disagree with this reviewer’s opinion I’ve seen several versions of Bye Bye Birdie including Tommy Tune’s 1991 tour and found Swarthmore’s version way more enjoyable. It was energetic, funny and heart warming. Great performances, loads of fun.


Anonymous
About 2 years ago

I completely agree with this reviewers opinion. I saw the show, and I found Albert’s character to be overacted and creepy. While this show is by nature hyper-sexualized, Swarthmore’s production was hyper-sexualized in all the wrong ways. The comedic timing was totally off for most of the show, and the parts that are supposed to be the most hilarious just came off feeling forced. I debated leaving at intermission but decided to stay for the whole show out of courtesy to the performers. Needless to say, by the end I knew how many tiles were on the ceiling of the theatre, and I was cringing every time Albert took the stage. Not my best theatre experience to be sure.


Anonymous
About 2 years ago

This reviewer mentions " The word “orgy,” which shows up unnervingly often….."

The word “Orgy” is said once during the show and when it is it is mispronounced and delivered up stage and goes right over the heads of most youngsters in the audience. If you choose to bash a show please get your facts straight.
I am sad thinking about how many children might not get a chance to see this fun peice of live(affordable) theatre because of this mean spirited review.
I found this show to be a delight from start to finish and I never once felt that it was inappropriate or “pedatory” . My 10 year old daughter has seen the show 4 times and will see it once more before it closes. This was a very well done and tasteful show. Kudos to the director who did a fantastic job!


Comments are closed.